Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2020, 56(4): 447-470

Age Homophily on a Czech Online Dating Site

Renáta Topinková1, Markéta Šetinová2
1 Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR, v. v. i., Praha
2 Fakulta sociálních věd, Univerzita Karlova, Praha

This article examines age homophily on a Czech online dating site using real user data. With a sample of 10 563 unique users and the aid of negative binomial regression, we test two hypotheses based on previous studies of online dating - namely, that men and women show different partner preferences with respect to age and that women in particular favour age homophily in their contacts. The model results support these hypotheses. Men are observed to prefer younger women, while women prefer men who are the same age or older than they are. Given that there are significantly fewer women on the dating site, they are the ones who choose, and the pairing result depends on whether they respond to a contact or not. The youngest women are contacted by men of all ages. Although men contact much younger women, they have a better chance of success with older women. Our conclusions are thus consistent with international research on homophily in the online environment and to some extent the results correspond to patterns of age homogamy in the Czech Republic. Unlike international research, however, the attractiveness of Czech men is found to decrease as they age.

Keywords: online dating, Czech Republic, age homophily, partner preferences, digital trace data

Received: June 18, 2020; Accepted: June 18, 2020; Published: October 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Topinková, R., & Šetinová, M. (2020). Age Homophily on a Czech Online Dating Site. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 56(4), 447-470
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ansari, A., E. Klinenberg. 2015. Modern romance. New York: Penguin Books.
    2. Becker, G. S. 1973. "A Theory of Marriage: Part I." Journal of Political Economy 81 (4): 813-846, https://doi.org/10.1086/260084. Go to original source...
    3. Buss, D. M. 1994. The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: BasicBooks.
    4. Fiore, A. T., J. S. Donath. 2005. "Homophily in online dating: when Do you like someone like yourself?" Pp. 1371-1374 in CHI EA '05: CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056919. Go to original source...
    5. Fučík, P. 2006. "Věková homogamie českých sňatků 1920-2000." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 42 (4): 719-740. Go to original source...
    6. Hakim, C. 2011. Honey money: the power of erotic capital. London: Allen Lane.
    7. Hamplová, D., P. Hampl, S. Weidnerová. 2017. "Krása - mýtus, nebo realita?" Pp. 15-20 in P. Matějů, D. Hamplová, P. Hampl, M. Loužek, S. Weidnerová, P. Anýžová, M. L. Smith. Moc krásy. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.
    8. Hitsch, G. J., A. Hortaçsu, D. Ariely. 2010. "What makes you click?-Mate preferences in online dating." Quantitative Marketing and Economics 8 (4): 393-427, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-010-9088-6. Go to original source...
    9. Hogue, A., L. Steinberg. 1995. "Homophily of Internalized Distress in Adolescent Peer Groups." Developmental Psychology 31 (6): 897-906, https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.6.897. Go to original source...
    10. Kalmijn, M. 1998. "Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends." Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1): 395-421, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395. Go to original source...
    11. Katrňák, T. 2008. Spříznění volbou? Homogamie a heterogamie manželských párů v České republice. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    12. Kreager, D. A., S. E. Cavanagh, J. Yen, M. Yu. 2014. "Where Have All the Good Men Gone? Gendered Interactions in Online Dating." Journal of Marriage and Family 76 (2): 387-410, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12072. Go to original source...
    13. McGrath, F. 2015. "Online Dating: What to Know About Tinder in 5 Charts." GlobalWebIndex [online]. [cit. 7. 6. 2018]. Dostupné z: https://blog.globalwebindex.com/trends/what-to-know-about-tinder/.
    14. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, J. M. Cook. 2001. "Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks." Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1): 415-444, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415. Go to original source...
    15. Morr Serewicz, M. C., E. Gale. 2008. "First-Date Scripts: Gender Roles, Context, and Relationship." Sex Roles 58 (3-4): 149-164, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9283-4. Go to original source...
    16. Možný, I. 2002. Sociologie rodiny. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    17. Nielsen Admosphere. 2019. "Láska přes internet: 4 z 10 Čechů už se někdy snažili seznámit online." Nielsen Admosphere [online]. [cit. 7. 6. 2019]. Dostupné z: https://www.nielsen-admosphere.cz/press/laska-pres-internet-4-z-10-cechu-uz-se-nekdy-snazili-seznamit-online/.
    18. Novinky.cz. 2014. "Začarovaný trojúhelník: Muži chtějí na seznamkách mladší ženy, je však chtějí starší." Novinky.cz [online]. 3. 9. 2017 [cit. 18. 7. 2018]. Dostupné z: https://www.novinky.cz/muzi/345588-zacarovany-trojuhelnik-muzi-chteji-na-seznamkach-mladsi-zeny-je-vsak-chteji-starsi.html.
    19. Potarca, G. 2017. "Does the internet affect assortative mating? Evidence from the U.S. and Germany." Social Science Research 61: 278-297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.019. Go to original source...
    20. Rose, S., I. H. Frieze. 1993. "Young singles' contemporary dating scripts." Sex Roles 28 (9-10): 499-509, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289677. Go to original source...
    21. Rosenfeld, M. J., R. J. Thomas. 2012. "Searching for a Mate: The Rise of the Internet as a Social Intermediary." American Sociological Review 77 (4): 523-547, https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412448050. Go to original source...
    22. Rudder, C. 2014. Dataclysm: who we are when we think no one's looking. London: Fourth Estate.
    23. Salganik, M. 2018. Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    24. Schaefer, D. R. 2012. "Homophily Through Nonreciprocity: Results of an Experiment." Social Forces 90 (4): 1271-1295, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos065. Go to original source...
    25. Skopek, J., F. Schulz, H. P. Blossfeld. 2011. "Who Contacts Whom? Educational Homophily in Online Mate Selection." European Sociological Review 27 (2): 180-195, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp068. Go to original source...
    26. Smith, A., M. Duggan. 2013. "Part 2: Dating Apps and Online Dating Sites." Pew Research Center [online]. Dostupné z: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/21/part-2-dating-apps-and-online-dating-sites/.
    27. Snijders, T. A. B., R. J. Bosker. 2012. Introduction. Pp. 1-5 in Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd ed. Sage.
    28. Valkenburg, P. M., J. Peter. 2007. "Who Visits Online Dating Sites? Exploring Some Characteristics of Online Daters." CyberPsychology & Behavior 10 (6): 849-852, https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9941. Go to original source...
    29. Zeman, K. 2006. "Věk při sňatku a rozdíl mezi věkem ženicha a věkem nevěsty v České republice v letech 1991-2004." Demografie 48 (1): 1-11.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content