Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2009, 45(5): 1055-1072 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2009.45.5.09

The Ambivalent Legacy of Charles Wright Mills' The Sociological Imagination

Jan Balon
Filosofický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i., Praha
Fakulta sociálních věd UK, Praha

Charles Wright Mills wrote his renowned and bestselling The Sociological Imagination fifty years ago with the ambition of providing an alternative to the theoretically unsubstantial and methodologically inhibiting approaches that predominated at that time. His battle against the idea of a politically and morally neutral understanding of social inquiry was rhetorically compelling and anticipated the radical voices that would be heard in the late 1960s. It is argued in this article that probably the best lesson we can get from Mills has to do with his understanding of 'sociology as a profession'. His argument addresses crucially important questions about the public relevance of social inquiry and the underlying themes of social-scientific reflexivity, creativity, and non-conformity. However, despite his rhetorical force and stylistic brilliance, Mills' overall message is considered ambivalent. His concept of social inquiry based on identification of morally and politically relevant problems ultimately leads to the vaporisation of the very substance of social inquiry and to the institutional debilitation of the field as such. The resulting uncertainty concerning the basic means and ends of sociology, together with a hyper-tolerance towards the delineation of sociological research area, often leads to the identifi cation of relevant problems on the basis of individual choice, inspiration, creativity, or imagination. It is suggested that this understanding of Mills' legacy usually results in the trivialisation and parody of the overall message embodied in The Sociological Imagination.

Keywords: imagination, creativity, identification of problems, value-neutrality, morally committed social inquiry.

Published: October 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Balon, J. (2009). The Ambivalent Legacy of Charles Wright Mills' The Sociological Imagination. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review45(5), 1055-1072. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2009.45.5.09
Download citation

References

  1. Abbot, J. R. 2006. "Critical Sociologies and Ressentiment: The Examples of C. W. Mills and Howard Becker." The American Sociologist 37 (3): 15-30. Go to original source...
  2. Alexander, J. C. 1984. "The Parsons' Revival in German Sociology." Sociological Theory 2: 394-412. Go to original source...
  3. Balon, J. 2007. Sociologická teorie: Příběh krize a fragmentace - projekt obnovy a rekonstrukce. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
  4. Balon, J. 2008. "Nenaplněný příslib sociologické teorie: vzestup a pád americké sociologie ve druhé polovině dvacátého století." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 44 (5): 943-967. Go to original source...
  5. Becker, H. 1967. "Whose Side Are We On?" Social Problems 14 (3): 239-247. Go to original source...
  6. Benjamin, W. 1979. Dílo a jeho zdroj. Praha: Odeon.
  7. Burawoy, M. 2005. "For Public Sociology." American Sociological Review 70 (1): 4-28. Go to original source...
  8. Calhoun, C. (ed.). 2007. Sociology in America: A History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  9. Clawson, D. et al. 2007. Public Sociology: Fifteen Eminent Sociologists Debate Politics and the Profession in the Twenty-first Century. Berkeley, Los Angeles: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  10. Crane, D., H. Small. 1992. "American Sociology Since the Seventies: the Emerging Identity Crisis in the Discipline." Pp. 197-235 in T. C. Halliday, M. Janowitz (eds.). Sociology and its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Davis, M. S. 1999. "Aphorisms and Cliches: The Generation and Dissipation of Conceptual Charisma." Annual Review of Sociology 25: 245-269. Go to original source...
  12. Denzin, N. K. 1986. "Postmodern Social Theory." Sociological Theory 4 (2): 194-204. Go to original source...
  13. Denzin, N. K. 1989. "Re-reading The Sociological Imagination." The American Sociologist 20 (3): 278-282. Go to original source...
  14. Denzin, N. K. 1990. "Presidential Address on The Sociological Imagination Revisited." Sociological Quarterly 31 (1): 1-22. Go to original source...
  15. Deutsch, S. E. 1971. "Review of The Coming Crisis of Sociology by Alvin Gouldner." American Sociological Review 36 (3): 321-326. Go to original source...
  16. Dvořák, T. 2008. "Sociologická technoimaginace." Teorie vědy / Theory of Science 30 (3-4): 85-116. Go to original source...
  17. Eldridge, J. 1983. C. Wright Mills. New York: Tavistock.
  18. Flacks, R. 1991. "The Sociology Liberation Movement: Some Legacies and Lessons." Pp. 17-27 in M. Oppenheimer, M. J. Murray, R. F. Levine (eds.). Radical Sociologists and the Movement: Experiences, Lessons, and Legacies. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  19. Flacks, R., G. Turkel. 1978. "Radical Sociology: The Emergence of Neo-Marxian Perspectives in U.S. Sociology." Annual Review of Sociology 4: 193-238. Go to original source...
  20. Fuller, S. 2006. The New Sociological Imagination. London: Sage. Go to original source...
  21. Geary, D. 2004. The Power and the Intellect: C. Wright Mills, the Left, and American Social Science. Disertační práce. Berkeley, CA: Department of History, University of California.
  22. Ghamara-Tabrizi, B. 2005. "Can Burawoy Make Everybody Happy? Comments on Public Sociology." Critical Sociology 31 (3): 361-369. Go to original source...
  23. Gouldner, A. W. 1970. The Coming Crisis Of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books. Go to original source...
  24. Gouldner, A. W. 2004. "Anti-minotaurus: mýtus sociologie oproštěné od hodnocení." Teorie vědy / Theory of Science 26 (4): 85-105.
  25. Gross, N. 2007. "Pragmatism, Phenomenology, and Twentieth-Century American Sociology." Pp. 183-224 in C. Calhoun (ed.). Sociology in America: A History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  26. Haney, D. 2008. The Americanization of Social Science: Intellectuals and Public Responsibility in the Postwar United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  27. Hodges, D. C. 1969. "The Fourth Epoch: Epilogue to the Unfinished Social Philosophy of C. W. Mills." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (3): 327-350. Go to original source...
  28. Holmwood, J. 2007. "Sociology as Public Discourse and Professional Practice. A Critique Of Michael Burawoy." Sociological Theory 25 (1): 46-66. Go to original source...
  29. Horowitz, I. L. 1964. "The Intellectual Genesis of C. Wright Mills." Pp. 11-31 in C. W. Mills. Sociology and Pragmatism: The Higher Learning in America. New York: Paine-Whitman Publishers.
  30. Horowitz, I. L. 1984. C. Wright Mills: An American Utopian. New York: Free Press.
  31. Horowitz, I. L. (ed.). 1963. Power, Politics, and People. The Collected Essays of C. Wright Mills. New York: Ballantine Books.
  32. Horowitz, I. L. (ed.). 1965. The New Sociology: Essays in Social Science and Social Theory in Honor of C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.
  33. Nicolaus, M. 1968. "Fat-Cat Sociology. Remarks at the American Sociological Association." The American Sociologist 4 (2): 154-156.
  34. Lynd, R. S. 1939. Knowledge For What? The Place of Social Science in American Culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  35. McLaughlin, N., L. Kowalchuk, K. Turcotte. 2005. "Why Sociology Does Not Have to Be Saved. Analytical Reflections on Public Sociologies." The American Sociologist 36 (3-4): 133-151. Go to original source...
  36. Merton, R. K. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
  37. Mills, C. W. 1951. White Collar: The American Middle Classes. New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  38. Mills, C. W. 1953. "Two Styles of Research in Current Social Studies." Philosophy of Science 20 (4): 266-275. Go to original source...
  39. Mills, C. W. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press. (Česky Mocenská elita. Praha: Mladá fronta, 1966.)
  40. Mills, C. W. 2008. Sociologická imaginace. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
  41. Molotch, H. 1994. "Going Out." Sociological Forum 9 (2): 221-239. Go to original source...
  42. Oakes, G., A. J. Vidich. 1999. Collaboration, Reputation, and Ethics in American Academic Life: Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  43. Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  44. Parsons, T. 1959. "Some Problems Confronting Sociology as a Profession." American Sociological Review 24 (4): 547-569.
  45. Press, H. 1978. C. Wright Mills. Boston: Twayne.
  46. Richardson, L. 1990. Writing Strategies: Reaching Diverse Audiences. Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
  47. Richardson, L. 1991. "Postmodern Social Theory: Representational Practices." Sociological Theory 9 (2): 173-179. Go to original source...
  48. Seidman, S. 1991a. "The End of Sociological Theory: The Postmodern Hope." Sociological Theory 9 (2): 131-146. Go to original source...
  49. Seidman, S. 1991b. "Postmodern Anxiety: The Politics of Epistemology." Sociological Theory 9 (2): 180-190. Go to original source...
  50. Seidman, S. 2004. Contested Knowledge: Social Theory Today. Malden, MA, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell.
  51. Seidman, S., D. G. Wagner (eds.). 1992. Postmodernism and Social Theory: The Debate Over General Theory. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  52. Shils, E. 1961. "Professor Mills on the Calling of Sociology." World Politics 13 (4): 600-621. Go to original source...
  53. Spinrad, W. 1966. "The Socio-Political Orientations of C. W. Mills: An Evaluation." British Journal of Sociology 17 (1): 46-59. Go to original source...
  54. Sterne, J. 2005. "C. Wright Mills, the Bureau for Applied Social Research, and the Meaning of Critical Scholarship." Cultural Studies / Critical Methodologies 5 (1): 65-94. Go to original source...
  55. The American Sociologist. 1989. 20 (4): 303-384. (Speciální blok k uzavření katedry sociologie na Washington University).
  56. Tilman, R. 1979. "The Intellectual Pedigree of C. Wright Mills: A Reappraisal." The Western Political Quarterly 32 (4): 479-496. Go to original source...
  57. Turner, J. H. 2005. "Is Public Sociology Such a Good Idea?" The American Sociologist 36 (3-4): 27-45. Go to original source...
  58. Turner, J. H., S. P. Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  59. Weber, M. 1998. Sociologie, metodologie, politika. Praha: Oikoymenh.
  60. Wiley, N. 1985. "The Current Interregnum in American Sociology." Social Research 52 (1): 179-207.
  61. Wolfe, A. 1992. "Weak Sociology/Strong Sociologists: Consequences and Contradictions of a Field in Turmoil." Social Research 59 (4): 759-779.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.