Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2006, 42(5): 883-912 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2006.42.5.03

The Proportionality of Electoral Formulas for Systems of Proportional Representation

Tomáš Lebeda
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, Praha

Published: October 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lebeda, T. (2006). The Proportionality of Electoral Formulas for Systems of Proportional Representation. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 42(5), 883-912. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2006.42.5.03
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Balinski, M. L., H. P. Young. 1975. "The Quota Method of Apportionment." American Mathematical Monthly 82: 701-730. Go to original source...
    2. Balinski, M. L., H. P. Young. 1982. Fair representation: Meeting the Ideal One Man, One Vote. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    3. Blondel, J. 1969. An Introduction to Comparative Government. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Go to original source...
    4. Duverger, M. 1978. Political Parties. Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. 3rd edition. London: Cambridge University Press.
    5. Electoral Systems and Voting Procedures at Local Level. 1999. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    6. Fabian, F., Z. Klubier. 1998. Metoda Monte Carlo a možnosti jejího uplatnění. Praha: Prospektrum.
    7. Farrell, D. M. 1997. Comparing Electoral Systems. New York, London: Prentice Hall, Harvester Wheatsheaf. Go to original source...
    8. Fiala, P. 2004. "Kritická interpretace 'zákonů' o vlivu volebních systémů na stranické systémy." Pp. 51-65 in M. Novák, T. Lebeda et al. Volební a stranické systémy, ČR v mezinárodním srovnání. Dobrá voda: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk.
    9. Filip, J. 1992. Základní otázky volebního práva v ČSFR. Brno: Právnická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity v Brně.
    10. Gallagher, M. 1991. "Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems." Electoral Studies 10: 33-51. Go to original source...
    11. Gallagher, M. 1992. "Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities." British Journal of Political Science 22: 469-496. Go to original source...
    12. Hermens, F. A. 1936. "Proportional Representation and the Breakdown of German Democracy." Social Research 3: 411-433.
    13. Krouský, O. 1933. Volební reforma. Praha: Národní obrození.
    14. Laakso, M. 1979. "Thresholds for Proportional Representation: Reanalyzed and Extended." Munich Social Science Review 1: 19-28.
    15. Lebeda, T. 2001a. "Hlavní proměnné poměrných volebních systémů." Sociologický časopis 37: 425-448. Go to original source...
    16. Lebeda, T. 2001b. "Přirozený práh poměrných systémů, teorie a realita." Politologický časopis 8 (2): 134-149.
    17. Lebeda, T. 2006. "Teorie reálné kvóty, alternativní přístup k měření volební proporcionality." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 42 (4): 657-681. Go to original source...
    18. Lijphart, A. 1986. "Degrees of Proportionality of Proportional Representation Formulas." Pp. 170-179 in B. Grofman, A. Lijphart (eds.). Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.
    19. Lijphart, A. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945-1990. New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    20. Lijphart, A., R. W. Gibberd. 1977. "Thresholds and Payoffs in List Systems of Proportional Representation." European Journal of Political Research 5: 219-244. Go to original source...
    21. Loosemore, J., V. J. Hanby. 1971. "The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytic Expressions for Electoral Systems." British Journal of Political Science 1: 467-477. Go to original source...
    22. Nohlen, D. 1990. Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem. Opladen: Leske Budrich.
    23. Pennisi, A. 1998. "Disproportionality Indexes and Robustness of Proportional Allocation Methods." Electoral Studies 17: 3-19. Go to original source...
    24. Rae, D. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven. London: Yale University Press.
    25. Riker, W. H. 1982. "The Two-party Systems and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science." American Political Science Review 76: 773-766. Go to original source...
    26. Rokkan, S. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Process of Development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
    27. Rose, R. (ed.). 2000. International Encyclopedia of Elections. London: Macmillan.
    28. Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. London: Cambridge University Press.
    29. Sartori, G. 2001. Srovnávací ústavní inženýrství. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství. (1st edition in English 1994.)
    30. Schuster, K., F. Pukelsheim, M. Drton, N. R. Draper. 2003. "Seat biases of apportionment methods for proportional representation." Electoral Studies 22: 651-676. Go to original source...
    31. Taagepera, R., M. S. Shugart. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content