Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2006, 42(4): 657-682 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2006.42.4.03

Real Quota Theory, an Alternative Approach to Measuring Electoral Proportionality

Tomáš Lebeda
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, Praha

Published: August 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lebeda, T. (2006). Real Quota Theory, an Alternative Approach to Measuring Electoral Proportionality. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 42(4), 657-682. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2006.42.4.03
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Allison, P. D. 1978. "Measures of Inequality." American Sociological Review 43: 865-880. Go to original source...
    2. Balinski M. L., H. P. Young. 1982. Fair representation: Meeting the Ideal One Man, One Vote. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    3. Cortona P. G. et al. 1999. Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics.
    4. Fabian F., Z. Klubier. 1998. Metoda Monte Carlo a možnosti jejího uplatnění. Praha: Prospektrum.
    5. Filip, J. 1992. Základní otázky volebního práva v ČSFR. Brno: Masarykova univerzita v Brně - Právnická fakulta.
    6. Fry, V., I. McLean. 1991. "A Note on Rose's Proportionality Index." Electoral Studies 10: 52-59. Go to original source...
    7. Gallagher, M. 1991. "Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems." Electoral Studies 10: 33-51. Go to original source...
    8. Gallagher, M. 1992. "Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities." British Journal of Political Science 22: 469-496. Go to original source...
    9. Lebeda, T. 2001. "Hlavní proměnné poměrných volebních systémů." Sociologický časopis 37: 425-448.
    10. Lebeda, T. 2003. "Průzkumy volebních preferencí před volbami do Sněmovny 2002." Politologický časopis 10: 22-37.
    11. Lebeda, T. 2004. "Stručný přehled volebních systémů." Pp. 19-43 in M. Novák, T. Lebeda a kol. Volební a stranické systémy. ČR v mezinárodním srovnání. Dobrá Voda: Aleš Čeněk.
    12. Lijphart, A. 1985. "The Field of Electoral Systems Research: A Critical Survey." Electoral Studies 4: 3-14. Go to original source...
    13. Lijphart, A. 1986. "Degrees of proportionality of proportional representation formulas." Pp. 170-179 in B. Grofman, A. Lijphart (eds.). Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.
    14. Lijphart, A. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945-1990. New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    15. Loosemore, J., V. J. Hanby. 1971. "The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytic Expressions for Electoral Systems." British Journal of Political Science 1: 467-477. Go to original source...
    16. Monroe, B. L. 1994. "Disproportionality and Malapportionment: Measuring Electoral Inequity." Electoral Studies 13: 132-149. Go to original source...
    17. Pennisi, A. 1998. "Disproportionality Indexes and Robustness of Proportional Allocation Methods." Electoral Studies 17: 3-19. Go to original source...
    18. Rae, D. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    19. Rose, R. 1984. "Electoral Systems. A Question of Degree or of Principle?" Pp. 73-82 in A. Lijphart, B. Grofman (eds.). Choosing an Electoral System. New York: Praeger Publishers.
    20. Taagepera, R., M. Laakso. 1980. "Proportionality Profiles of Western European Electoral Systems." European Journal of Political Research 8: 423-446. Go to original source...
    21. Taagepera, R., M. S. Shugart. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content