Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2003, 39(6): 795-814

Capitalist Divergence and Labour Market Flexibility in the Czech Republic and Hungary: A Comparative Analysis of Standard and Non-Standard Employment

Maarten Keune
The European University Institute in Florence

Zveřejněno: 1. prosinec 2003  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Keune, M. (2003). Capitalist Divergence and Labour Market Flexibility in the Czech Republic and Hungary: A Comparative Analysis of Standard and Non-Standard Employment. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 39(6), 795-814
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Cazes, S. and A. Nešporová. 2001. "Labour Market Flexibility in the Transition Countries. How Much is too Much?" International Labour Review 140 (3): 293-325. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Crouch, C. 1993. Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. Crouch, C. and W. Streeck (eds.). 1997. Political Economy of Modern Capitalism, Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    4. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Esping-Andersen, G. and M. Regini (eds.). 2000. Why Deregulate Labour Markets? Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
    6. European Commission. 2001. Employment in Europe 2001. Recent Trends and Prospects. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    7. Fazekas, K. and T. Koltay (eds.). 2002. The Hungarian Labour Market. Review and Analysis 2002. Budapest: Institute of Economics HAS and Hungarian Employment Foundation.
    8. Frýdmanová, M, K. Janáček, P. Mareš and T. Sirovátka. 1999. "Labour Market and Human Resources." Pp. 21-43 in Ten Years of Rebuilding Capitalism: Czech Society after 1989, edited by J. Večerník and P. Matějů. Prague: Academia.
    9. Gábor, I. 1999. "Post-socialist Transformation and the Labour Market in Hungary - the Quest for Institutional Realignment." Acta Oeconomica 50 (1-2): 103-117.
    10. Hall, P. and D. Soskice (eds.). 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Keune, M. 1998. Youth Unemployment in Hungary and Poland. Employment and Training Papers. Geneva: ILO.
    12. Keune, M. 2002. "Institutionalising Capitalism: Changing Labour Market Institutions in Hungary after State Socialism." Pp. 76-94 in Labour Relations in Development, edited by A. Fernandez and M. Riethof. London: Routledge. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. Kertesi, G. and J. Köllő. 1999. Economic Transformation and the Return to Human Capital: The Case of Hungary, 1986-1996. Budapest Working Papers on the Labour Market 1999/6. Budapest: Institute of Economics.
    14. Köllő, J. 1998. "Employment and Wage Setting in Three Stages of Hungary's Labour Market Transition." Pp. 57-108 in Enterprise Restructuring and Unemployment in Models of Transition, edited by S. Commander. Washington: World Bank.
    15. Kornai, J. 1992. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. New Jersey: Princeton. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. Kornai, J. 2001. "Hardening the Budget Constraint: The Experience of the Post-Socialist Countries." European Economic Review 45: 1573-1599. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. Laky, T. 1996. Labour Market Report 1995. Budapest: Hungarian Foundation for Enterprise Promotion.
    18. Nešporová, A. and V. Uldrichová. 1997. "Employment Policies and Programmes in the Czech Republic." Pp. 47-77 in Employment Policies and Programmes in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by M. Godfrey and P. Richards. Geneva: ILO.
    19. Riboud, M., C. Sánchez-Páramo and C. Silva-Jáuregui. 2002. Does Eurosclerosis Matter? Institutional Reform and Labour Market Performance in Central and Eastern European Countries in the 1990s. Social Protection Discussion Papers Series No. 0202. Washington: The World Bank. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    20. Rosser, J.B Jr., M.V. Rosser and E. Ahmed. 2000. "Income Inequality and the Informal Economy in Transition Economies." Journal of Comparative Economics 28 (1): 156-171. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. Sarfati, H. G. and Bonoli (eds.). 2002. Labour Market and Social Protection Reforms in International Perspective. Parallel or Converging Tracks? Aldershot: Ashgate.
    22. Schneider, F. 2002. "The Size and Development of the Shadow Economies and the Shadow Economy Labour Force of 22 Transition and 21 OECD Coutries: What Do We Really Know?" Paper presented at the Round Table Conference 'On the Informal Economy', Sofia, Bulgaria, 18-20 April 2002 http://www.csd.bg/news/bert/schneider-paper.PDF (seen 23-01-2003).
    23. Standing, G. 1999. Global Labour Flexibility. Seeking Distributive Justice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    24. UN-ECE. 2000. Economic Survey of Europe 2000. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
    25. Večerník, J. 2001a. Labour Market Flexibility and Employment Security: Czech Republic. Employment Paper 2001/27. Geneva: ILO.
    26. Večerník, J. 2001b. Earning Disparities in the Czech Republic: Evidence of the Past Decade and Cross-National Comparison. WDI Working Paper No. 373. Michigan: William Davidson Institute. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Večerník, J. and P. Matějů (eds.). 1999. Ten Years of Rebuilding Capitalism: Czech Society after 1989. Prague: Academia.

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah