Czech Sociological Review 1996, 4(2):135-148 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.1996.32.12.03

The Comparative Historical Approach as a Unifying Principle in the Humanities and the Social Sciences

Jaroslav Krejčí
Centre for Research into Socio-Cultural Pluralism, Institute of Philosophy, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague

Published: September 1, 1996  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krejčí, J. (1996). The Comparative Historical Approach as a Unifying Principle in the Humanities and the Social Sciences. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 32(2), 135-148. doi: 10.13060/00380288.1996.32.12.03
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bloch, M. 1961. Feudal Society, Vol. I. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    2. Coulborn, R. 1965. Feudalism in History. Hemden, CT: Archon Books (First published 1956 in Princeton University Press).
    3. Gurvitch, G. 1968. La vocation actuelle de la sociologie 4th ed., Paris: Presses universitaires de France, Vol I.
    4. Hart, A. G. 1968. International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 10.
    5. Holmwood, J. 1996. Founding Sociology. Talcott Parsons and the Idea of General Theory. London & New York: Longman.
    6. Kamrava, M. 1990. Revolution in Iran: The Roots of Turmoil. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    7. Krejčí, J. 1976. Social Structure in Divided Germany. London: Croom Helm.
    8. Krejčí, J. 1990. The Civilizations of Asia and the Middle East Before the European Challenge. London: Macmillan. Go to original source...
    9. Krejčí, J. 1993. The Human Predicament. Its Changing Image. London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin's. Go to original source...
    10. Krejčí, J. 1994. The Great Revolutions Compared. The Outline of a Theory. London, New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
    11. Machonin, P. 1996. "Social Metamorphoses." Pp. 111-244 in Czechoslovakia 1918-1992. A Laboratory for Social Change, ed. by J. Krejčí & P. Machonin. Basingstoke, Oxford: Macmillan, St. Antony's Series.
    12. Malia, M. 1980. Comprendre la Révolution russe. Paris: Seuil.
    13. Perkin, H. 1989. The Rise of Professional Society. England since 1880. London & New York: Routledge.
    14. Perkin, H. 1996. The Third Revolution. Professional elites in the Modern World. London & New York: Routledge.
    15. Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World System, Vol. 1. New York, London: Academic Press.
    16. Wallerstein, I. 1980. The Modern World System, Vol. 2. New York, London: Academic Press.
    17. Wallerstein, I. 1989. The Modern World System, Vol. 3. New York, London: Academic Press.
    18. Wallerstein, I. 1995. After Liberatism. New York: The New Press.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content