Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2024.033

‘We Condemn the Sin, not the Sinner’: Understanding the Attitudes of Adventist and Baptist Believers in Montenegro towards Sexuality

Vladimir Bakrač ORCID...1, Branislav Radeljić ORCID...2
1 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro
2 School of Law and International Relations, Nebrija University, Madrid, Spain

Although we have seen studies on religion and sexuality in the West come to dominate the relevant scholarship, the postsocialist environment with a predominantly Orthodox population has received less attention. This paper fills the gap by examining the attitudes of Adventist and Baptist believers in Montenegro, with a particular focus on abortion, premarital sexual activities and non-heteronormative sexuality. Because we were dealing with a minority population, we opted for a qualitative methodology and conducted semistructured interviews with 17 Adventist and 15 Baptist believers. As observed, our research participants’ position towards sexuality is closely related to the teachings found in the Bible. However, it is possible to observe certain differences between the two groups; for example, the interviewed Adventists tend to be more conservative than the interviewed Baptists. In addition, the male Adventists seem slightly more liberal than female Adventists, whereas the situation is different among Baptists, where women come across as more liberal than men.

Klíčová slova: religion, Adventist Church, Baptist Church, abortion, premarital sexual activities, non-heteronormative sexuality

Vloženo: 27. listopad 2023; Revidováno: 9. září 2024; Přijato: 10. září 2024; Zveřejněno online: 10. září 2024 

Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Adamczyk, A. (2008). The effects of religious contextual norms, structural constraints, and personal religiosity on abortion decisions. Social Sciences Research, 37(2), 657-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.09.003 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Adamczyk, A., & Hayes, B. E. (2012). Religion and sexual behaviors: Understanding the influence of Islamic cultures and religious affiliation for explaining sex outside of marriage. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 723-746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412458672 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. Alvaré, H. M. (2015). Religious freedom versus sexual expression: A guide. Journal of Law and Religion, 30(3), 475-495. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2015.21 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    4. American Baptist Churches. (1994, March 31). Resolution Concerning Abortion and Ministry in the Local Church. http://religiousinstitute.org/denom_statements/american-baptist-resolution-concerning-abortion-and-ministry-in-the-local-church/
    5. Babst, G. A., Gill, E. R., & Pierceson, J. (Eds.) (2009). Moral Argument, Religion and Same-sex Marriage. Lexington Books. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. Baker, J. O., Molle, A., & Bader, C. A. (2020). The flesh and the devil: Belief in religious evil and views of sexual morality. Review of Religious Research, 62(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-020-00403-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. Bakioki, S., Holbruk, F., Ožandr, F., Frensis, O., & Maršal, D. (1994). Adventistički hrišćani veruju. Preporod.
    8. Bakrač, V., Vuković-Ćalasan, D., Živković, P., & Šarović, R. (2020). Adventists in Montenegro: From the atheistic psychosis of socialism to the post-socialist individuation of adventism. Religions, 11(5), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11050233 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    9. Baptist Press. (2019, June 13). Resolutions Contend for Vulnerable, Gospel. https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/resolutions-contend-for-vulnerable-gospel/
    10. Barkan, S. E. (2006). Religiosity and premarital sex in adulthood. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(3), 407-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00315.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Barkan, S. E. (2014). Gender and abortion attitudes: Religiosity as a suppressor variable. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 940-950. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu047 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. Barringer, M. N., Gay, D. A., & Lynxwiler, J. P. (2013). Gender, religiosity, spirituality, and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sociological Spectrum, 33(3), 240-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2013.732903 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. Baunach, D. M. (2011). Decomposing trends in attitudes toward gay marriage, 1988-2006. Social Science Quarterly, 92(2), 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00772.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Bilić, B. (Ed.) (2016). LGBT Activism and Europeanisation in the Post-Yugoslav Space: On the Rainbow Way to Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57261-5 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    15. Bo, S., & Veber, F. (2005). Vodič kroz terensku anketu. Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
    16. Brockopp, J. E. (Ed.) (2003). Islamic Ethics of Life: Abortion, War and Euthanasia. University of South Carolina Press.
    17. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
    18. Burdette, A. M., Ellison, C. G., & Hill, T. D. (2005). Conservative Protestantism and tolerance toward homosexuals: An examination of potential mechanisms. Sociological Inquiry, 75(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00118.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. Cady, L. E., & Fessenden, T. (Eds.). (2013). Religion, the Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference. Columbia University Press.
    20. Cannell, C. F., & Kahn, R. L. (1968). Interviewing. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 526-595). Addison Wesley.
    21. Clements, B. (2014). Religion and the sources of public opposition to abortion in Britain: The role of 'belonging', 'behaving' and 'believing'. Sociology, 48(2), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513490354 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    22. CEDEM. (2020). Obrasci i stepen diskriminacije u Crnoj Gori 2020.
    23. Davie, G. (2007). The Sociology of Religion. Sage.
    24. Derks, M. (2018). Sexual and religious regimes of the self in Dutch discourses about homosexuality: A queer theological analysis and alternative. International Journal of Public Theology, 12(3-4), 353-378. https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-12341547 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. Doebler, S. (2015). Relationships between religion and two forms of homonegativity in Europe: A multilevel analysis of effects of believing, belonging and religious practice. PLoS ONE, 10(8), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133538 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. Drukman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041-1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00100 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Ellison, C. G., Echevarría, S., & Smith, B. (2005). Religion and abortion attitudes among US Hispanics: Findings from the 1990 Latino National Political Survey. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 192-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00298.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. Emerson, M. O. (1996). Through tinted glasses: Religion, worldviews, and abortion attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386394 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    29. Endsjø, D. Ø. (2011). Sex and Religion: Teachings and Taboos in the History of World Faiths. Reaktion Books.
    30. Finke, R., & Adamczyk, A. (2008). Cross-national moral beliefs: The influence of national religious context. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(4), 617-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00130.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    31. Francis, L. J. (1997). The psychology of gender differences in religion: A review of empirical research. Religion, 27(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1006/reli.1996.0066 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. Franzosi, R. (1998). Narrative analysis: Or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 517-554. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.517 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    33. Frohwirth, L., Coleman, M., & Moore, A. M. (2018). Managing religion and morality within the abortion experience: Qualitative interviews with women obtaining abortions in the US. World Medical & Health Policy, 10(4), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.289 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    34. Gavrilović, D. (2009). Socijalna distanca u sferi rizičnog seksualnog ponašanja. In T. Stefanović Stanojević (Ed.), Studenti, seks i droga: Rizično seksualno ponašanje studenata Univerziteta u Nišu i njihova iskustva sa narkoticima (pp. 143-148). Centar za naučna istraživanja SANU i Univerziteta u Nišu.
    35. Gibson, W., & Begiato, J. (2017). Sex and the Church in the Long Eighteenth Century. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350988002 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    36. Gill, E. R. (2012). An Argument for Same-sex Marriage: Religious Freedom, Sexual Freedom, and Public Expressions of Civic Equality. Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book17430 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    37. Godzisz, P. (2019). The Europeanization of anti-LGBT hate crime in the Western Balkans. Crime, Law and Social Change, 71(3), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-019-09818-9 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    38. Government of Montenegro. (2013a, May 9). Strategy for Improving Quality of Life of LGBT Persons. https://rm.coe.int/16801e8db7
    39. Government of Montenegro. (2013b, June 22). Predlog strategije za očuvanje i unapredjenje reproduktivnog i seksualnog zdravlja 2013-2020, s predlogom akcionog plana za period 2014-2015. https://www.gov.me/en/documents/170c72a2-a5e3-4d24-88b4-3c1f19c4f7e3
    40. Gross, M., Vecho, O., Gratton, E., D'Amore, S., & Green, R.-J. (2018). Religious affiliation, religiosity, and attitudes toward same-sex parenting. Journal of LGBT Family Studies, 14(3), 238-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1326016 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    41. Gushee, D. P. (2017). Changing Our Mind. Read the Spirits Books.
    42. Halmi, A. (2005). Strategije kvalitativnih istraživanja u primijenjenim društvenim znanostima. Naklada Slap.
    43. Hayward, G. M. (2019). Religiosity and premarital sexual behaviors among adolescents: An analysis of functional form. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 58(2), 439-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12588 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    44. Ipsos. (2022). Istraživanje javnog mnjenja o percepciji prema LGBTIQ osobama. https://media.cgo-cce.org/2022/06/LGBTIQ-sloboda-bez-etiketa_Istrazivanje-javnog-mnjenja-F.pdf
    45. Jakobsen, J. R., & Pellegrini, A. (2003). Love the Sin: Sexual Regulation and the Limits of Religious Tolerance. New York University Press.
    46. Jäckle, S., & Wenzelburger, G. (2015). Religion, religiosity, and the attitudes toward homosexuality: A multilevel analysis of 79 countries. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(2), 207-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.969071 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    47. Johansson, W., & Percy, W. A. (1996). Homosexuality. In V. L. Bullough & J. A. Brundage (Eds.), Handbook of Mediaeval Sexuality (pp. 155-189). Garland.
    48. Johnson, P., & Vanderbeck, R. M. (2014). Law, Religion and Homosexuality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203427507 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    49. Jones, S. (1985). Depth interviewing. In R. Walker (Ed.), Applied Qualitative Research (pp. 45-55). Gower Publishing.
    50. Jovanović, M. (2010). Meni je on super drug: O religioznosti i seksualnosti lezbejke iz Niša. Godišnjak za sociologiju, 6(6), 75-87.
    51. Jovanović, M. (2013). Silence or condemnation: The Orthodox Church on homosexuality in Serbia. Družboslovne razprave, XXIX(73), 79-95.
    52. Jovanović, M. (2016a). Revitalized Orthodoxy and LGBT people in contemporary Serbia. Facta Universitatis, 15(2), 83-92.
    53. Jovanović, M. (2016b). Identitet, religioznost, seksualnost: Problem identiteta religioznih LGBT osoba u Srbiji. Mediterran Publishing.
    54. Jovanović, M., & Krstić, N. (2020). Fellow travelers from Serbia: LGBT-identified persons and the church in the process of Europeanization. Facta Universitatis, 19(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH2001027J Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    55. Jung, G. (2016). Does transnational experience constrain religiosity? Korean Evangelical women's discourse on LGBT persons. Religions, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel7100124 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    56. Juventas. (2012, December 1). Report: Montenegro. https://www.ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/Attachments/montenegro_monitoring_implementation_of_the_coe_recommendation_-_27_12_2012.pdf
    57. Kalezić, D., & Brković, Č. (2016). Queering as Europeanisation, Europeanisation as queering: Challenging homophobia in everyday life in Montenegro. In B. Bilić (Ed.), LGBT Activism and Europeanisation in the Post-Yugoslav Space: On the Rainbow Way to Europe (pp. 155-178). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57261-5_6 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    58. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). The science in social science. In G. King, R. O. Keohane, & S. Verba (Eds.), Designing Social Enquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (pp. 3-33). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821211 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    59. Kostić, A. (1961). Homoseksualnost. In A. Šercer (Ed.), Medicinska enciklopedija, Tom 5 (pp. 133-139). Leksikografski zavod FNRJ.
    60. Krueger, J. (2013). The road to disbelief: A study of the atheist de-conversion process. Journal of Undergraduate Research, XVI, 1-9.
    61. Lawrence, R. J. (2007). Sexual Liberation: The Scandal of Christendom. Praeger Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216013648 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    62. LeDrew, S. (2013). Scientism, Humanism, and Religion: The New Atheism and the Rise of the Secular Movement [PhD dissertation, University of York].
    63. Liebertz, S., & Bunch, J. (2021). Backfiring frames: Abortion politics, religion, and attitude resistance. Politics and Religion, 14(3), 403-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048320000310 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    64. Liviatan, O. (2012). From abortion to Islam: The changing function of law in Europe's cultural debates. Fordham International Law Journal, 36(1), 93-135. http://www.tinyurl.com/y47su5m9
    65. Lizotte, M.-K. (2015). The abortion attitudes paradox: Model specification and gender differences. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 36(1), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2015.985151 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    66. Marković, P. J. (2007). Seksualnost između privatnog i javnog u 20. veku. In M. Ristović (Ed.), Privatni život kod Srba u dvadesetom veku (pp. 101-128). Clio.
    67. Matthews, M. A., & Mazzocco, P. J. (2017). Perceptions of religious hypocrisy: When moral claims exceed moral action. Review of Religious Research, 59(4), 519-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-017-0307-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    68. McDowell, M. G. (2011). Sexual ethics. In J. A. McGuckin (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of Eastern Orthodox Christianity (pp. 570-572). Wiley-Blackwell.
    69. Merino, S. M. (2013). Contact with gays and lesbians and same-sex marriage support: The moderating role of social context. Social Science Research, 42(4), 1156-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.02.004 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    70. Moberg, D. O. (1987). Holy masquerade: Hypocrisy in religion. Review of Religious Research, 29(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/3511949 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    71. Morse, C. N., McLaren, S., & McLachlan, A. J. (2007). The attitudes of Australian heterosexuals toward same-sex parents. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 3(4), 425-455. https://doi.org/10.1300/J461v03n04_04 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    72. Nie, F., & Price, A. (2020). Is safe space safe? Being gay and college faculty across religious moral communities. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 42(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2020.1816398 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    73. Ognjenović G., & Jozelić, J. (Eds.) (2014). Politicization of Religion and the Power of State, Nation, and Faith: The Case of Former Yugoslavia and Its Successor States. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137477866 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    74. Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., & Harrison, J. T. (2006). Religion and public opinion about same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 340-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00384.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    75. Perry, S. L. (2013). Multiracial church attendance and support for same-sex romantic and family relationships. Sociological Inquiry, 83(2), 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12005 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    76. Perry, S. L., & Whitehead, A. L. (2016a). Religion and public opinion toward same-sex relations, marriage, and adoption: Does the type of practice matter? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55(3), 637-651. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12215 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    77. Perry, S. L., & Whitehead, A. L. (2016b). Religion and non-traditional families in the United States. Sociology Compass, 10(5), 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12370 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    78. Pew Research Center. (2017, November 8). Orthodox Christianity in the 21st century. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/12/Orthodoxy-II-FULL-REPORT-12-5.pdf
    79. Radeljić, B. (2015). From Brussels to Belgrade: Challenges in conducting research and constructing explanations of the collapse of Yugoslavia. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621382 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    80. Radeljić, B., & Topić, M. (Eds.) (2015). Religion in the Post-Yugoslav Context. Lexington Books. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    81. Ravitch, F. S. (2016). Freedom's Edge: Religious Freedom, Sexual Freedom, and the Future of America. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316670057 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    82. Regnerus, M. D., & Smith, C. (1998). Selective deprivatization among American religious traditions: The reversal of the great reversal. Social Forces, 76(4), 1347-1372. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/76.4.1347 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    83. Ruiu, G., & Gonano, G. (2020). Religious barriers to the diffusion of same-sex civil unions in Italy. Population Research and Policy Review, 39(6), 1185-1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09613-8 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    84. Scheitle, C., & Adamczyk, A. (2009). It takes two: The interplay of individual and group theology on social embeddedness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 8(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01427.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    85. Scott, J. W. 2018. Sex and Secularism. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888580 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    86. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
    87. Seventh-day Adventist Church. (2012, October 17). Homosexuality. https://www.adventist.org/official-statements/homosexuality/
    88. Seventh-day Adventist Church. (2019, October 16). Statement on the Biblical View of Unborn Life and Its Implications for Abortion. https://www.adventist.org/official-statements/statement-on-the-biblical-view-of-unborn-life-and-its-implications-for-abortion/
    89. Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary. (2015). An Understanding of the Biblical View on Homosexual Practice and Pastoral Care. Book 27. http://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/sem-books/27
    90. Shah, T. S., Farr, T. F., & Friedman, J. (2016). Religious Freedom and Gay Rights: Emerging Conflicts in the United States and Europe. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190600600.001.0001 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    91. Silber Mohamed, H. (2018). Embryonic politics: Attitudes about abortion, stem cell research, and IVF. Politics and Religion, 11(3), 459-497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175504831800010X Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    92. Slootmaeckers, K., Touquet, H., & Vermeersch, P. (Eds.) (2016). The EU Enlargement and Gay Politics: The Impact of Eastern Enlargement on Rights, Activism and Prejudice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48093-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    93. Spasić, I. (1990). Gay potkultura i društvena kontrola homoseksualnosti [UG dissertation, University of Belgrade].
    94. Spektra. (2018). Montenegro: Report on the implementation of the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers Recommendation CM/REC(2010)5 on measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity. https://tgeu.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/COE-Report-Oct18-Montenegro.pdf
    95. Smith, J. M. (2013). Creating a godless community: The collective identity work of contemporary American atheists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(1), 80-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12009 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    96. Steffens, M. C., & Wagner, C. (2004). Attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, bisexual women, and bisexual men in Germany. Journal of Sex Research, 41(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552222 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    97. Sullins, P. D. (1999). Catholic/Protestant trends on abortion: Convergence and polarity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(3), 354-369. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387757 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    98. Swinton, J., & Brock, B. (Eds.) (2018). A graceful embrace: Theological reflections on adopting children. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352902 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    99. Šćepanović, L. (2017, November 20). Priča o neželjenim devojčicama. Radio Free Europe. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/nezeljene-djevojcice-selektivni-abortusi/28864851.html
    100. Šćepanović, L. (2022, May 17). Posle pola vijeka od prava na abortus u Crnoj Gori pravi se pitanje. Radio Free Europe. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/31855117.html
    101. Šipka, D. (2011). Rečnik opscenih reči i izraza. Prometej.
    102. Taylor, Y., & Snowdon, R. (Eds.) (2018). Queering Religion, Religious Queries. Routledge.
    103. Uecker, J. E. (2008). Religion, pledging, and the premarital sexual behavior of married young couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(3), 728-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00517.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    104. Walter, T., & Davie, G. (1998). The religiosity of women in the modern west. British Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 640-659. https://doi.org/10.2307/591293 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    105. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narratives and Semi-structured Methods. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209717 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    106. Whitehead, A. L. (2018). Religious organizations and homosexuality: The acceptance of gays and lesbians in American congregations. Review of Religious Research, 55(2), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-012-0066-1 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    107. Yamane, D. (2000). Narrative and religious experience. Sociology of Religion, 61(2), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.2307/3712284 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    108. Yip, A. K. T. (2005). Queering religious texts: An exploration of British non-heterosexual Christians' and Muslims' strategy of constructing sexuality affirming hermeneutics. Sociology, 39(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505049000 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    109. Yousaf, O., & Gobet, F. (2013). The emotional and attitudinal consequences of religious hypocrisy: Experimental evidence using a cognitive dissonance paradigm. Journal of Social Psychology, 153(6), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2013.814620 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Návrat zpět