Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2002, 38(6): 693-720 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2002.38.6.02

Social Capital in Transition: A First Look at the Evidence

Martin Raise, Christian Haerpfer, Thomas Nowotny, Claire Wallace
1 Office of the Chief Economist, EBRD (corresponding author)
2 Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Vienna, 3 University of Vienna, Austrian National Bank

Zveřejněno: 1. prosinec 2002  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Raise, M., Haerpfer, C., Nowotny, T., & Wallace, C. (2002). Social Capital in Transition: A First Look at the Evidence. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review38(6), 693-720. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2002.38.6.02
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Aslund, A. 1996. "Reform and Rent-Seeking in Russia's Economic Transformation". Transition, 26. January 1996: 12-16.
  2. Atkinson, A., J. Micklewright 1992. Economic Transformation in Eastern Europe and the Distribution of Income. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bolle, F. 1998. "Does Trust Pay?" European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), mimeo, August 1998.
  4. Bourdieu, P. 1993. "Forms of Capital". In: Richardson, J. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.
  5. Coleman, J. 1988. "Social Capital and the Creation of Human Capital". American Journal of Sociology 94 (supplement): 94-120. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Conradt, D. 1980. "Changing German Political Culture". Pp. 212-272 in Almond, G, S. Verba (eds.), The Civic Culture Re-Visited. Boston: Little Brown, Dasgupta, P., I. Serageldin (eds.) 1999. Social Capital. A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
  7. Ferrara, la A. and E. 2000. "The Determinants of Trust", NBER Working Paper, No 7621, March 2000.
  8. Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
  9. Gati, C. 1996. "The Mirage of Democracy". Transition, 22 March 1996: 6-12.
  10. Greene, W. 2000. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  11. Greif, A. 1994. "Cultural Beliefs and the Organisation of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies". Journal of Political Economy 102 (5): 912-950. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. Havel, V. 1989. Living in Truth. Boston: Faber and Faber.
  13. Hayri, A., G. A. McDermott 1998. "The Network Properties of Corporate Governance and Industrial Restructuring: A Post-Socialist Lesson". Industrial and Corporate Change 7 (1): 153-193. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  14. Hellman, J., G. Jones, D. Kaufman et al. 2000a. Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption and Influence in Transition. The World Bank, mimeo, September 2000. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. Hellman, J., G. Jones, D. Kaufman, M. Schankerman et al. 2000b. Measuring Governance and State Capture: The Role of Bureaucrats and Firms in Shaping the Business Environment. World Bank Working Paper No. 2312, Washington D.C. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  16. Humphrey, J., H. Schmitz 1996. Trust and Economic Development, Brighton Institute of Development Studies, Discussion Paper no. 355.
  17. Knack, S., P. Keefer 1997. "Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation". The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. CXII (December 98): 1252-1288. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  18. Knack, S., P. Zak 1998. Trust and Growth. University of Maryland, mimeographed.
  19. Kolankiewicz, G. 1996. "Social Capital and Social Change". British Journal of Sociology 47, 3: 427-441. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  20. Linz, J., A. Stepan 1996. Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
  21. Lo, Dic 1995. "Economic Theory and the Transformation of the Soviet-Type System: The Challenge of the Late Industrialisation Perspective". In Chang, Ha-Joon, P. Nolan (eds.), The Transformation of the Communist Economies. London: Macmillan. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  22. Konrad, G. 1987. Antipolitics. New York: H. Holt.
  23. Marody, M. 1997. "Post-Transitology or is there any Life after Transition", Polish Sociological Review 117/1: 13-21.
  24. Matzner, E. 2000. Monopolare Weltordnung. Marburg: Metropolis.
  25. Market Economy, World Bank Regional and Sectoral Studies, Washington D.C.
  26. Nowotny, T. 1998. Central/Eastern Europe and Transitology. Wien: ÖIIP.
  27. Ockenfels, J. Weimann 1996. Types and Patterns: An Experimental East-West Comparison of Co-operation and Solidarity. Magdeburg: Otto-von-Guericke-Univerisity Magdeburg, Working Paper 11.
  28. Olson, M. 1993. "Dictatorship, Democracy and Development". American Political Science Review, Sept. 1993. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  29. Platteau, J. P. 1994. "Behind the Market Stage Where Real Societies Exist - Part II: Trust and Generalised Morality". Journal of Development Studies 30, 4: 754-817. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  30. Poppo, L., T. Zenger 2000. Substitutes or Complements? Exploring the Relationship between Formal Contracts and Relational Governance, John M Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis, mimeo. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  31. Putnam, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  32. Raiser, M. 1999. Trust in Transition. EBRD Working Paper, No. 39, London.
  33. Rose, R. 1993. "Rethinking Civil Society: Postcommunism and the Problem of Trust." Journal of Democracy 1, 1: 18-29. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  34. Rose, R. 1995. "Russia as an Hour-Glass Society: A Constitution without Citizens". East European Constitutional Review 4, 3: 34-42.
  35. Rose, R., W. Mishler, C. Haerpfer 1997. Getting Real. Social Capital in Post-Communist Societies. University of Strathclyde, Studies in Public Policy, No. 278.
  36. Rose, R. 1998. Getting Things Done with Social Capital: New Russia Barometer VII. University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, No. 303.
  37. Rose, R., W. Mishler, C. Haerpfer 1998. Democracy and its Alternatives: Testing the Churchill Hypothesis in Post-Communist Countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  38. Schmitter, P. 1993. Some Propositions about Civil Society and the Consolidation of Democracy. Vienna: IHS.
  39. Sedaitis, J. B. 1997. "Network Dynamics of New Firm Foundation: Developing Russian Commodity Markets". Grabher, G., D. Stark (eds.), Restructuring Networks in Post-Socialism: Legacies, Linkages and Localities. Oxford University Press.
  40. Schiff, M. 2000. Love thy Neighbour: Trade, Migration and Social Capital. Development Research Group, The World Bank, Washington D.C., mimeo. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  41. Stark, D. 1997. "Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism". Grabher, G., D. Stark (eds.), Restructuring Networks in Post-Socialism: Legacies, Linkages, an Localities, Oxford University Press.
  42. Smolar, A. 1996. "Civil Society After Communism: From Opposition to Atomization". Journal of Democracy Vol. 4, 1: 24-38. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  43. Stiglitz, J. 1996. Some Lessons from the East Asian Miracle, the World Bank Research Observer, vol. II, no. 2 August 1996, p. 151-177. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  44. Stiglitz, J. 1999. "Wither Reform?" Paper presented at the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington D.C., April 1999.
  45. Surcke, M. 2000. "The Quality and Size of Government in Transition Economies - are they still different?" Hamburger Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv (HWWA), mimeo, August 2000.
  46. Shleifer, A. 1997. "Government in Transition", Cambridge MA, Harvard Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Paper 1783.
  47. Tardos, R. 1998. "Ways of interpretation and the uses of the social capital concept". Paper presented at the INSA Sunbelt conference.
  48. Wallace, C. 1999. "Investing in Social Capital. The Case of Small Traders in Central and Eastern Europe". International Journal of Urban and Regional Research: 23, 4: 751-770.

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.