Sociologický časopis 1998, 34(2):195-204 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.1998.34.2.08

Quality of Data II. Approaches to the Evaluation of Research Instruments based on Covariance Structure Modelling

Jan Řehák
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, Praha

Published: April 1, 1998  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Řehák, J. (1998). Quality of Data II. Approaches to the Evaluation of Research Instruments based on Covariance Structure Modelling. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 34(2), 195-204. doi: 10.13060/00380288.1998.34.2.08
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alwin, D. F. 1989. "Problems in the data estimation and interpretation of reliability of survey data." Quality and Quantity 23: 409-442. Go to original source...
    2. Andrews, F. M. 1984. "Construct validity and error components of survey measures: a structural modelling approach." Public Opinion Quarterly 18: 409-442. Go to original source...
    3. Campbell, D. I., D. W. Fiske 1959. "Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix." Psychological Bulletin 56: 81-105. Go to original source...
    4. Heise, D. R. 1969. "Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation." American Sociological Review 34, 93-101. Go to original source...
    5. Lord, F. M., M. R. Novick 1968. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Publ. Comp.
    6. Řehák, J. 1998. "Kvalita dat I. Klasický model měření reliability a jeho praktický aplikační význam." Sociologický časopis 34: 51-60. Go to original source...
    7. Řehák, J., I. Bártová, J. Hamanová, P. Havlanová 1998. "Kvalita dat III. Empirické výsledky pro vybrané míry a stupnice." Sociologický časopis 34 (připraveno k publikaci). Go to original source...
    8. Saris, W. E. 1990. "Models for evaluation of measurement instruments." Pp. 52-80 in Evaluation of measurement instruments by meta-analysis of multitrait multimethod studies, ed. by W. E. Saris and A. van Meurs. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    9. Saris, W. E., A. van Meurs (eds.) 1990. Evaluation of measurement instruments by meta-analysis of multitrait multimethod studies. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    10. Saris, W. E., A. Satorra 1988. "Characteristics of structural equation models which affect the power of the likelihood ratio test." Pp. 121-133 in Sociometric Research, vol. 2: Data analysis, ed. by W. E. Saris and J. N. Galhofer. London: MacMillan. Go to original source...
    11. Satorra, A., W. E. Saris 1985. "Power of likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis." Psychometrika 50: 83-90. Go to original source...
    12. Scherpenzeel, A. 1995. A Question of Quality. Amsterdam: Royal PTT Netherland NV.
    13. Werts, C. E., K. G. Jøreskog, R. L. Linn 1971. "Comment on the estimation of measurement error in panel data." American Sociological Review 35: 112-117. Go to original source...
    14. Wiley, D. E., J. A. Wiley 1970. "The estimation of measurement error in panel data." American Sociological Review 35: 112-117. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content